California has taken an enormous step towards regulating AI. SB 243 — a invoice that may regulate AI companion chatbots to be able to defend minors and weak customers — handed each the State Meeting and Senate with bipartisan help and now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk.
Newsom has till October 12 to both veto the invoice or signal it into regulation. If he indicators, it will take impact January 1, 2026, making California the primary state to require AI chatbot operators to implement security protocols for AI companions and maintain corporations legally accountable if their chatbots fail to satisfy these requirements.
The invoice particularly goals to stop companion chatbots, which the laws defines as AI techniques that present adaptive, human-like responses and are able to assembly a person’s social wants – from partaking in conversations round suicidal ideation, self-harm, or sexually specific content material. The invoice would require platforms to offer recurring alerts to customers – each three hours for minors – reminding them that they’re talking to an AI chatbot, not an actual particular person, and that they need to take a break. It additionally establishes annual reporting and transparency necessities for AI corporations that provide companion chatbots, together with main gamers OpenAI, Character.AI, and Replika, which might go into impact July 1, 2027.
The California invoice would additionally permit people who imagine they’ve been injured by violations to file lawsuits towards AI corporations in search of injunctive reduction, damages (as much as $1,000 per violation), and legal professional’s charges.
The invoice gained momentum within the California legislature following the dying of teenager Adam Raine, who dedicated suicide after extended chats with OpenAI’s ChatGPT that concerned discussing and planning his dying and self-harm. The laws additionally responds to leaked inside paperwork that reportedly confirmed Meta’s chatbots had been allowed to interact in “romantic” and “sensual” chats with kids.
In latest weeks, U.S. lawmakers and regulators have responded with intensified scrutiny of AI platforms’ safeguards to guard minors. The Federal Trade Commission is getting ready to analyze how AI chatbots affect kids’s psychological well being. Texas Legal professional Normal Ken Paxton has launched investigations into Meta and Character.AI, accusing them of deceptive kids with psychological well being claims. In the meantime, each Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) have launched separate probes into Meta.
“I feel the hurt is doubtlessly nice, which implies we’ve to maneuver rapidly,” Padilla informed TechCrunch. “We will put affordable safeguards in place to make it possible for significantly minors know they’re not speaking to an actual human being, that these platforms hyperlink individuals to the correct assets when individuals say issues like they’re desirous about hurting themselves or they’re in misery, [and] to verify there’s not inappropriate publicity to inappropriate materials.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Padilla additionally burdened the significance of AI corporations sharing knowledge in regards to the variety of instances they refer customers to disaster companies every year, “so we’ve a greater understanding of the frequency of this drawback, quite than solely turning into conscious of it when somebody’s harmed or worse.”
SB 243 beforehand had stronger necessities, however many had been whittled down by amendments. For instance, the invoice initially would have required operators to stop AI chatbots from utilizing “variable reward” ways or different options that encourage extreme engagement. These ways, utilized by AI companion corporations like Replika and Character, supply customers particular messages, recollections, storylines, or the flexibility to unlock uncommon responses or new personalities, creating what critics name a doubtlessly addictive reward loop.
The present invoice additionally removes provisions that may have required operators to trace and report how typically chatbots initiated discussions of suicidal ideation or actions with customers.
“I feel it strikes the correct stability of attending to the harms with out imposing one thing that’s both unimaginable for corporations to adjust to, both as a result of it’s technically not possible or simply a variety of paperwork for nothing,” Becker informed TechCrunch.
SB 243 is shifting towards turning into regulation at a time when Silicon Valley corporations are pouring tens of millions of {dollars} into pro-AI political motion committees (PACs) to again candidates within the upcoming mid-term elections who favor a light-touch method to AI regulation.
The invoice additionally comes as California weighs one other AI security invoice, SB 53, which might mandate complete transparency reporting necessities. OpenAI has written an open letter to Governor Newsom, asking him to desert that invoice in favor of much less stringent federal and worldwide frameworks. Main tech corporations like Meta, Google, and Amazon have additionally opposed SB 53. In distinction, solely Anthropic has mentioned it helps SB 53.
“I reject the premise that it is a zero sum state of affairs, that innovation and regulation are mutually unique,” Padilla mentioned. “Don’t inform me that we will’t stroll and chew gum. We will help innovation and improvement that we predict is wholesome and has advantages – and there are advantages to this know-how, clearly – and on the similar time, we will present affordable safeguards for essentially the most weak individuals.”
“We’re intently monitoring the legislative and regulatory panorama, and we welcome working with regulators and lawmakers as they start to think about laws for this rising house,” a Character.AI spokesperson informed TechCrunch, noting that the startup already contains outstanding disclaimers all through the person chat expertise explaining that it ought to be handled as fiction.
A spokesperson for Meta declined to remark.
TechCrunch has reached out to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Replika for remark.