Customers on social media have found a controversial use case for Google’s new Gemini AI mannequin: eradicating watermarks from pictures, together with from pictures revealed by Getty Pictures and different well-known inventory media outfits.
Final week, Google expanded entry to its Gemini 2.0 Flash mannequin’s picture era function, which lets the mannequin natively generate and edit picture content material. It’s a powerful capability, by all accounts. Nevertheless it additionally seems to have few guardrails. Gemini 2.0 Flash will uncomplainingly create pictures depicting celebrities and copyrighted characters, and — as alluded to earlier — take away watermarks from present pictures.
New talent unlocked: Gemini 2 Flash mannequin is de facto superior at eradicating watermarks in pictures! pic.twitter.com/6QIk0FlfCv
— Deedy (@deedydas) March 15, 2025
As a number of X and Reddit customers famous, Gemini 2.0 Flash received’t simply take away watermarks, however try and fill in any gaps created by a watermark’s deletion. Different AI-powered instruments do that, too, however Gemini 2.0 Flash appears to be exceptionally expert at it — and free to make use of.
Gemini 2.0 Flash, obtainable in Google’s AI studio, is superb at modifying pictures with easy textual content prompts.
It can also take away watermarks from pictures (and places its personal delicate watermark in as a substitute 🤣) pic.twitter.com/ZnHTQJsT1Z
— Tanay Jaipuria (@tanayj) March 16, 2025
To be clear, Gemini 2.0 Flash’s picture era function is labeled as “experimental” and “not for manufacturing use” in the mean time, and is just obtainable in Google’s developer-facing instruments like AI Studio. The mannequin additionally isn’t an ideal watermark remover. Gemini 2.0 Flash seems to wrestle with sure semi-transparent watermarks and watermarks that canvas giant parts of pictures.
Nonetheless, some copyright holders will certainly take subject with Gemini 2.0 Flash’s lack of utilization restrictions. Fashions together with Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonnet and OpenAI’s GPT-4o explicitly refuse to take away watermarks; Claude calls eradicating a watermark from a picture “unethical and probably unlawful.”
Eradicating a watermark with out the unique proprietor’s consent is taken into account unlawful beneath U.S. copyright legislation (in keeping with law firms like this one) outside of rare exceptions.
Google didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark despatched outdoors of regular enterprise hours.